Cherry Picking Democracy?
Dec 10, 2014
Posted by on in 2012 the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) at the Home Office voted for a strike in a ballot with a turnout of 20%. In a related article George Osborne demanded tough new strike laws , leading to the Conservative Party proposing plans to tighten the law on strike ballots if it wins the 2015 election. The proposal is a requirement for at least half of eligible union members to vote (50%) in order for a strike to be lawful. (The Tories Strike Back).
A 50% turnout (the popular vote) of eligible voters would still only requires 25%+1 of all those balloted to win the vote. However, participation in a democratic vote is open to 100% of those eligible to vote. So it may seem reasonable to take this 50% criterion as also being democratic.
If this 50% criterion is considered right for a union ballot of members to be lawfully valid, then surely it should be the criterion for a vote to be lawfully valid in a first past the post electoral system?
So will the Conservative 2015 election manifesto apply its 50% proposal to, say, parliamentary constituency elections and all referendums? Will a failure to meet this 50% criterion result in a ballot being declared void as it would for a union ballot lawfully held but not lawfully valid?
The table below shows the maximum (77.7%) and the minimum (59.4%) voter turnout (popular vote) for a general election post 1979. No political party has won a general election supported by more than 40% of the registered electorate¹.
While all have won elections with popular votes of more than 50% of the registered electorate some constituencies did not. In the 2010 general election it wasn’t a requirement, but at least two constituencies failed to achieve a popular vote of 50% or greater and a number came very close to failing this criterion.
The popular vote in the recent Rochester by-election was only 50.67% almost enough to declare the election void had the 50% criterion applied. The popular vote falling below 50% is a trend that is likely to increase by the 2020 general election and any preceding by-elections.
Year |
General Election |
Percentage of- |
Parliamentary |
|||
Popular Vote (%) |
Winner |
Popular Vote |
Registered Electorate |
Seats |
Majority |
|
1992 |
77.7% |
Conservative |
41.9% |
32.58% |
336 |
21 |
2001 |
59.4% |
New Labour |
40.68% |
24.16% |
412 |
165 |
2010 |
Popular Vote (%) |
Political Party |
Percentage of – |
Parliamentary |
||
Popular Vote |
Registered Electorate |
Seats |
Majority |
|||
65.01%
|
Conservative |
36.05% |
23.47% |
306 |
-37 |
|
New Labour |
28.99% |
18.87% |
258 |
-133 |
||
Lib -Dem |
23.03% |
14.99% |
57 |
-535 |
||
Others |
11.93% |
7.77% |
28 |
-593 |
||
Coalition |
59.08% |
38.46% |
363 |
+77 |
Successive governments, post 1945, have won general elections with 40+% of the popular vote (except for 1974) until the general election of 2005. The general elections of 2001, 2005 and 2010 have seen the voter turnout for a general election drop significantly below the 70+% of all previous post 1945 general elections.
¹Note – If you take the registered electorate as 100%, there is only one occasion that a political party achieved more than 40% of the registered electorate vote. In 1951 Labour polled 40.24% of the registered electorate vote (48.78% of the popular vote) but ‘lost’ the election to the Conservatives who received only 39.58% of the registered electorate vote (47.97% of the popular vote). [The Conservative ‘win’ was due to the electoral boundaries in place at the time].
Elections are fundamental to democracy. They are the mechanism by which citizens exercise their democratic rights. [Nicholas Paines QC]
Read 24/7/12 original here: Cherry Picking Democracy
It’s ridiculous that a union can call a strike with less than 50% of those eligible voting for it.
A vote in an election is not the same thing as a strike vote.
Some time ago there was a proposal for a ‘Null MP’ whereby if the non voters in a constituency outnumbered the votes for any candidate then a null MP was deemed to have been elected. He or She ‘took’ their seat in parliament and was assumed to vote against all motions.
LikeLike
I’m not really sure what you are implying Jazz; is it that at least 50%+1 should be the criterion?
Do you think that a vote for parliament representation or a referendum result should be less because it’s not the same?
If the Conservatives are intent on establishing a democratic vote, why is this democracy only made available to the Unions.
LikeLike